<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing&#8217;s twitter search doesn&#8217;t honor robots.txt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/07/02/bing-twitter-search-doesnt-honor-robots-txt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/07/02/bing-twitter-search-doesnt-honor-robots-txt/</link>
	<description>podcast addict, believes in occam razor, software consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen van Eck</title>
		<link>http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/07/02/bing-twitter-search-doesnt-honor-robots-txt/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen van Eck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=250#comment-344</guid>
		<description>As you probably know twitter uses the non-www URL&#039;s as main domain. You&#039;re showing the www. version of robots.txt. Now check http://twitter.com/robots.txt and you&#039;ll see that Twitter does want it&#039;s content to get indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you probably know twitter uses the non-www URL&#8217;s as main domain. You&#8217;re showing the www. version of robots.txt. Now check <a href="http://twitter.com/robots.txt" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/robots.txt</a> and you&#8217;ll see that Twitter does want it&#8217;s content to get indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
