Comments on: Speculating on Google Wave: is Google really aiming for Http? http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/ podcast addict, believes in occam razor, software consultant Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:00:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: neofreko http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-413 neofreko Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:56:23 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-413 Ajax will still be there for backward compatibility :D. Client-server transport, aside from loading main UI (boot), will be taken care by Wave/XMPP protocol. Ajax will still be there for backward compatibility :D . Client-server transport, aside from loading main UI (boot), will be taken care by Wave/XMPP protocol.

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-416 Fajar Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:12:51 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-416 Its okay, I'm good. I'm having too much workload anyway. Another 'toy' would surely kill my productivity. lol Its okay, I'm good. I'm having too much workload anyway. Another 'toy' would surely kill my productivity. lol

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-412 Fajar Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:10:36 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-412 I though xmpp was used only for federation? I though xmpp was used only for federation?

]]> By: ronaldwidha http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-415 ronaldwidha Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:00:14 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-415 hahaa..unfortunately I don't have any nomination quota left. But the spec is there for the taking Wave hahaa..unfortunately I don't have any nomination quota left. But the spec is there for the taking Wave

]]> By: ronaldwidha http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-411 ronaldwidha Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:59:21 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-411 So you're saying instead of ajax over html...it's ajax over xmmp/wave?<br>errr...kinky. but me likey! So you're saying instead of ajax over html…it's ajax over xmmp/wave?
errr…kinky. but me likey!

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-414 Fajar Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:51:42 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-414 So a challenge huh? <br>very subtle...<br><br>Anyway, I would love to read the spec after google send me my invite.<br>*refreshes inbox, again* So a challenge huh?
very subtle…

Anyway, I would love to read the spec after google send me my invite.
*refreshes inbox, again*

]]> By: neofreko http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-410 neofreko Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:50:04 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-410 In order to see Wave protocol at its fullest, someone need to port it into Chrome or Firefox as in-browser API and expose it in JS. Til that day comes, I'll sit here scratching my head as I can't digest the protocol with my current brain :D In order to see Wave protocol at its fullest, someone need to port it into Chrome or Firefox as in-browser API and expose it in JS. Til that day comes, I'll sit here scratching my head as I can't digest the protocol with my current brain :D

]]> By: neofreko http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-366 neofreko Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:56:23 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-366 Ajax will still be there for backward compatibility :D. Client-server transport, aside from loading main UI (boot), will be taken care by Wave/XMPP protocol. Ajax will still be there for backward compatibility :D . Client-server transport, aside from loading main UI (boot), will be taken care by Wave/XMPP protocol.

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-365 Fajar Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:12:51 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-365 Its okay, I'm good. I'm having too much workload anyway. Another 'toy' would surely kill my productivity. lol Its okay, I'm good. I'm having too much workload anyway. Another 'toy' would surely kill my productivity. lol

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/comment-page-1/#comment-364 Fajar Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:10:36 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/07/speculating-on-google-wave-is-google-really-aiming-for-http/#comment-364 I though xmpp was used only for federation? I though xmpp was used only for federation?

]]>