Comments on: 10 Features why Asp.Net 4 is better for public website http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/ podcast addict, believes in occam razor, software consultant Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:00:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: ronaldwidha http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-594 ronaldwidha Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:46:50 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-594 have you ever heard of "use the best tool for the job" ? have you ever heard of “use the best tool for the job” ?

]]> By: Javmes http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-593 Javmes Sun, 12 Jun 2011 14:06:56 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-593 Lolz...Screenshot from a php website to explain the Asp.NET Feature..heheheheh Lolz…Screenshot from a php website to explain the Asp.NET Feature..heheheheh

]]> By: Simones Salamone http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-545 Simones Salamone Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:11:40 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-545 asp net file browser <br><a href="http://www.gleamtech.com/products/fileultimate/asp-net-file-manager-control" rel="nofollow">http://www.gleamtech.com/products/fileultimate/asp-net-file-manager-control</a> <br>FileUltimate is an ASP.NET file manager control which you can add directly to your existing ASP.NET (.aspx) pages. The control renders a user interface similar to "Windows Explorer" within the page and this user interface allows you to view the contents of the predefined root folders and allow complete file management actions within those folders. File management actions can be limited by predefined permissions and quota limits on each folder separately. asp net file browser

http://www.gleamtech.com/products/fileultimate/asp-net-file-manager-control

FileUltimate is an ASP.NET file manager control which you can add directly to your existing ASP.NET (.aspx) pages. The control renders a user interface similar to “Windows Explorer” within the page and this user interface allows you to view the contents of the predefined root folders and allow complete file management actions within those folders. File management actions can be limited by predefined permissions and quota limits on each folder separately.

]]> By: air jordan 13 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-496 air jordan 13 Mon, 05 Jul 2010 11:30:14 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-496 Mark S. is definitely on the right track. If you want to get a professional looking email address, Id recommend buying your name domain name, like or <br><a href="http://www.gucci-outlet-store.com/Gucci-sweaters.html" rel="nofollow">Gucci sweaters</a> <br> If its common it might be difficult to get, however, be creative and you can usually find something. Mark S. is definitely on the right track. If you want to get a professional looking email address, Id recommend buying your name domain name, like or
Gucci sweaters
If its common it might be difficult to get, however, be creative and you can usually find something.

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-404 Fajar Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:17:40 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-404 Yes of course. My work is not going live until June 2010, so if .net4<br>could really make it to final version in Q1 of 2010, I think I can<br>spend a few weeks just messing around. Or maybe work on it for the<br>next iteration. Who knows. Yes of course. My work is not going live until June 2010, so if .net4
could really make it to final version in Q1 of 2010, I think I can
spend a few weeks just messing around. Or maybe work on it for the
next iteration. Who knows.

]]> By: ronaldwidha http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-403 ronaldwidha Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:10:49 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-403 Having control over ID is indeed pretty sweet. However, you can still disable viewstate on <a href="http://asp.net" rel="nofollow">asp.net</a> 3.5, just not site-wide I don't think.<br><br>Remember you'll be working on beta technology (<a href="http://asp.net" rel="nofollow">asp.net</a>, .net4 and vs2010 are all still in beta). Watchout for <a href="http://Asp.net" rel="nofollow">Asp.net</a> 4 beta 2 is out 19th October for MSDN subscriber and general public on 21st. Having control over ID is indeed pretty sweet. However, you can still disable viewstate on asp.net 3.5, just not site-wide I don't think.

Remember you'll be working on beta technology (asp.net, .net4 and vs2010 are all still in beta). Watchout for Asp.net 4 beta 2 is out 19th October for MSDN subscriber and general public on 21st.

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-402 Fajar Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:03:11 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-402 Nice! I might consider porting my current work to ASP.NET 4 just for point number 5 and 6. Nice! I might consider porting my current work to ASP.NET 4 just for point number 5 and 6.

]]> By: ronaldwidha http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-401 ronaldwidha Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:47:03 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-401 Looking at the <a href="http://Asp.net" rel="nofollow">Asp.net</a> 4 overview document, there isn't seem a whole lot of information about what gets deprecated. But my guess would be it's gonna be straightforward. From <a href="http://ASP.net" rel="nofollow">ASP.net</a> perspective, all the web controls and http related classes are still supported.<br><br>So is in terms of the language support and overall .Net framework stuff. I'd be surprised if it was as troublesome as .Net 1.1 to .Net 2.0. Back then there was a shift how the web project was handled, etc. It's not the case from 3.5 to 4 Looking at the Asp.net 4 overview document, there isn't seem a whole lot of information about what gets deprecated. But my guess would be it's gonna be straightforward. From ASP.net perspective, all the web controls and http related classes are still supported.

So is in terms of the language support and overall .Net framework stuff. I'd be surprised if it was as troublesome as .Net 1.1 to .Net 2.0. Back then there was a shift how the web project was handled, etc. It's not the case from 3.5 to 4

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-400 Fajar Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:39:16 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-400 Good news there! Any ideas about porting existing ASP.NET 3.5 to this version? Good news there! Any ideas about porting existing ASP.NET 3.5 to this version?

]]> By: Fajar http://www.ronaldwidha.net/2009/10/18/10-features-why-asp-net-4-is-better-for-public-website/comment-page-1/#comment-384 Fajar Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:17:40 +0000 http://www.ronaldwidha.net/?p=326#comment-384 Yes of course. My work is not going live until June 2010, so if .net4<br>could really make it to final version in Q1 of 2010, I think I can<br>spend a few weeks just messing around. Or maybe work on it for the<br>next iteration. Who knows. Yes of course. My work is not going live until June 2010, so if .net4
could really make it to final version in Q1 of 2010, I think I can
spend a few weeks just messing around. Or maybe work on it for the
next iteration. Who knows.

]]>